Bedding plants: unheated high tunnels an energy-saving option
In experiments comparing high tunnels with greenhouses for growing bedding plants, petunias finished in an unheated high tunnel (left) were shorter and more compact than those grown in a heated greenhouse (right). Photo courtesy of Neil Mattson.
Dec. 9, 2014, West Lafayette, NY — Energy costs account for one of the largest expenses in commercial greenhouse production of annual bedding plants.
Naturally, bedding plant producers are searching for more energy-efficient production methods that can reduce fuel usage and increase profits.
Christopher Currey, Roberto Lopez, and Neil Mattson published a study in HortTechnology that gives growers in northern latitudes valuable information on finishing practices for annual bedding plants.
The researchers compared traditional heated greenhouses with unheated high tunnels for growing 10 popular bedding plants at two USDA Hardiness Zone 5 locations: Ithaca, New York, and Lafayette, Indiana.
According to the researchers, energy for heating commercial greenhouses in northern climates can account for 10-30 per cent of total operating costs.
“In floriculture, high tunnels are traditionally used in cut flower production for season extension and frost protection,” the authors said. “Though not designed to be equivalent to greenhouses for year-round protected crop cultivation, high tunnels have the potential to be used for seasonal crop cultivation.”
DAYTIME/NIGHTTIME TEMPERATURE FLUCTUATIONS
Daytime air temperatures inside high tunnels can range from 5-20 C warmer than ambient outdoor air temperatures, but temperatures at night in unheated high tunnels can be about the same or occasionally lower than outdoor air temperatures.
The scientists grew 10 popular bedding plants (angelonia, vinca, celosia, dianthus, geranium, petunia, french marigold, viola, snapdragon, and osteospermum) in both an unheated high tunnel and a glass-glazed greenhouse with an 18 C temperature set point at both Cornell University and Purdue University.
At Cornell, all 10 species survived in the unheated high tunnel environment when moved on April 1. The lowest recorded temperature at the Cornell high tunnel was -3.2 C.
“It is interesting to note that the cold-sensitive species angelonia, celosia, and vinca survived this short-term cold exposure,” said corresponding author Roberto Lopez.
MOST SPECIES SHOWED SIGNIFICANT FLOWERING DELAY
However, most of the species showed a significant delay in flowering when grown in the high tunnel compared to when they were grown in the heated greenhouse. Although seven of the species exhibited a delay in flowering in the high tunnel compared with those in the heated greenhouse, there were no differences in days to flower for geranium, osteospermum, and viola grown at Cornell, and viola grown at Purdue.
At Purdue, several species were lost because of a cold temperature event (-6 C), necessitating a second planting (April 8).
“Delaying the high tunnel transplant date was an effective method for reducing plant mortality and reducing delays in days to flower because of the cold temperature environment of the high tunnel,” the authors said.
For the second planting, osteospermum was the only species that flowered significantly later in the high tunnel, a delay of seven days compared to the greenhouse-grown plants.
MORE THAN JUST ENERGY SAVINGS
According to author Neil Mattson, besides savings in energy costs, finishing cold-tolerant bedding plants in unheated high tunnels may enable growers to meet their seasonal peak space demand in a cheaper-to-build high tunnel while still providing some protection compared to the outside environment.
“Further, in the current study finishing bedding plants in high tunnels led to improvements in measures of plant quality for some crops, such as shorter, more compact plants than greenhouse-grown counterparts. This could reduce the need for application of chemical plant growth regulators.”
The authors concluded that production of cold-tolerant annuals in unheated or minimally heated high tunnels can be a “viable alternative” for commercial producers aiming to reduce energy costs.
“While we acknowledge the risk of finishing spring bedding plant crops in an unheated environment, there is a potential for gains in profitability for producers because of the lower capital and energy costs of high tunnels as compared with conventional greenhouses,” the authors said.
The complete study and abstract are available on the ASHS HortTechnology electronic journal website.
Founded in 1903, the American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS) is the largest organization dedicated to advancing all facets of horticultural research, education, and application. More information at ashs.org.
Subscription CentreNew Subscription Already a Subscriber Customer Service View Digital Magazine Renew
4 key differences between a cannabis greenhouse and an ornamental greenhouseWhen the legal industry began to emerge, indoor cannabis grow…
KPU secures major funding for hort researchA search for natural alternatives to pesticides is one of…
What’s in store at the Green Industry ShowThe 2018 Green Industry Show & Conference (GISC) is just…
A different light for ornamental grassesStarting a decade ago, researchers focused on the potential of…
Poinsettia Open HouseTue Nov 20, 2018 @10:00am - 02:30pm
Farm Energy WorkshopSat Nov 24, 2018
HortEastTue Nov 27, 2018
Great Lakes Expo 2018Tue Dec 04, 2018 @ 8:00am - 05:00pm
Midwest Green Industry Experience - Member SummitWed Dec 12, 2018
CongressWed Jan 09, 2019