|Research at the Greenhouse and Processing Crops Research Centre in Harrow, Ont. PHOTO COURTESY XIUMING HAO/AAFC
According to Khosla, there were no greenhouse vegetable growers in Ontario using grow pipes 10 years ago, but their use today (almost all on tomatoes) totals about 166 acres. This represents approximately 16 per cent of the total greenhouse tomato production area in Ontario.
BEST SUITED TO VEGETABLE CROPS BECAUSE OF THEIR FULL CANOPIES
■ Grow pipes are much more suited to vegetables than potted ornamental crops because vegetables are tall crops with a lot of canopy.
“To prevent heat loss to the greenhouse roof, the grow pipe needs to be fully covered by crop canopy,” Hao explains. “In-floor heating systems for potted ornamentals can play a similar role for ornamentals as grow pipes do for vegetable crops.”
Hao began his grow pipe studies at the GPCRC on greenhouse tomatoes because the raised-gutter production of this crop has become very popular in Ontario.
“Compared to conventional greenhouse tomato production on the ground, this system changes the microclimate profile in the greenhouse,” Hao explains. “The growing media and crop canopy are further away from the floor heating pipes, which can lead to more heat being needed in order to maintain adequate plant microclimate and to prevent pathogen infections. Grow pipes mitigate this need for more heat, but must be placed properly.”
RESEARCH HAS DEEP ROOTS IN THE ONTARIO INDUSTRY
■ At the GPCRC and a commercial tomato greenhouse in Ruthven, Ont., in 2004 and 2005, Hao and his colleagues tested how grow pipe placement affects plant microclimate, incidence of Botrytis, plant growth, tomato yield and energy consumption.
| “Dual” grow pipe set-up – temperature of each pipe can be controlled separately. PHOTO COURTESY JOHN LELIE/ENERTEC MECHANICAL
| Traditional grow pipe heating. Below the grow pipe is the CO2 dosing hose. PHOTO COURTESY JOHN LELIE/ENERTEC MECHANICAL
“Since grow pipes at 55 cm had the higher early and seasonal total fruit yield (3.2 kg m2, or a six per cent increase) and required less energy consumption than those at 150 cm (2.1 kg m2, or a four per cent increase) we concluded that this placement location is better,” Hao adds.
“Most of the yield increase with grow pipes was in the early production period,” he explains. However, “the grow pipe can’t be used too early when the plants are very small just after planting in December. More energy could be used if the crop canopy has not covered the grow pipe yet, but once the grow pipes are covered by the canopy, energy use should be the same or less.”
He adds that in the fall when grow pipes instead of ground heating pipes were used for greenhouse dehumidification, about 10 per cent energy was saved, and the monthly average humidity in crop canopy was reduced by about five per cent.
“That reduced incidence of Botrytis,” he notes. “For example, in July the incidence in the grow pipe section was only between three and four per cent, while it was 12 per cent in the control section.”
Further developments in heat placement and energy conservation were evaluated by Hao and his colleagues in 2005. They devised a second set-up called new heat placement by placing the main heating pipes underneath the raised trough.
“This way, the heat is forced to go through the canopy to warm up the plants instead of the air, and that’s important because it’s the plant temperature that directly affects plant growth.”
Hao notes that this set-up is especially useful for greenhouses that still have a steam heating system, because steam pipes can be placed underneath the raised trough and used as a second stage of heating. This new heat placement increased early fruit yield without more energy use.
In 2008 and 2009, Hao also did research (again supported by OGVG and AAFC) on the use of grow pipes in mini-cucumber production. “We compared the use of a 2.1 cm diameter grow pipe placed just below the harvesting fruit to no grow pipe heating, and found that having the grow pipes significantly improved fruit yield,” Hao says. “Marketable fruit yield (Jawell and Picowell averaged) with grow pipes was 16.3 kg/m2 and without, 14.56 kg/m2.”
GROWERS STRIVING TO IMPROVE ENERGY EFFICIENCY
■ Grower desire for energy efficiency will lead to more grow pipe adoption in the future.
|Grow pipes are becoming increasingly popular in the province. PHOTO COURTESY XIUMING HAO/AAFC
|This shows a
steam system that has been converted to hot water. The 1-1/4” pipe hangs
low in between the crop. This facility has a grow pipe higher up as
well. PHOTO COURTESY JOHN LELIE/ENERTEC MECHANICAL
Enertec has worked on two greenhouse projects where the dual rail transport and heating system was removed, and two sets of grow pipes were placed close to roots and near top of canopy, as Hao has researched. This system is able to heat the cucumber plants adequately during the winter months. “Cost return is not determined with these projects, but both operators feel they can grow a better product, and more cucumbers,” Lelie says.
He adds, “A lot of people heat their greenhouses with steam, and say therefore that they can’t have grow pipes because they have no hot water. However, if they implement a flue gas condenser, they can have grow pipes, and recover CO2 from that (saving on liquid CO2), while increasing boiler efficiency about 12 per cent.”
He says that cost return in this situation is achieved in three to five years, depending on CO2 and fuel costs.
Hao believes grow pipe use will become more widespread. “The price for grow pipes has increased and much experience and skills are required to use them properly,” he notes. “However, there is a great deal of knowledge now about grow pipes. Talking to the experts and visiting the facilities where grow pipes have been used is always a good place to start.”
Treena Hein is a freelance writer in Ontario, and former editor of Energy Edge.