Greenhouse Canada Magazine
Subscription Centre
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP   |   BUYERS GUIDE
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
Videos

Twitter
MARKETPLACE
Classifieds
New Products
Horticultural Books
Job Board
COMMUNITY
Blog
Events
 
RESOURCES
Buyers Guide
E-Newsletter
Links
Photo Gallery
Sitemap
 
WEATHER
Choose farm zone:
NORTHERN BC
CENTRAL QUEBEC
MANITOBA
NORTHERN ALBERTA
MARITIMES
SOUTHERN ONTARIO
SASKATCHEWAN
SOUTHERN BC
SOUTHERN QUEBEC
NORTHERN ONTARIO
SOUTHERN ALBERTA
NEWFOUNDLAND
powered by:
farmzonelogo
Publications
Canadian Florist

Canadian Garden Centre & Nursery

Fruit and Vegetable

U.S. growers wary of costs of ‘certified sustainable’
Written by Brian Wallheimer, Purdue University   
May 26, 2010, West Lafayette, IN – Commercial flower growers want to tap into the growing market of consumers looking for sustainable products, but those same growers aren't willing to go through a difficult and costly certification to do it at this time.

Purdue University's Roberto Lopez and Jennifer Dennis, assistant professors of horticulture, and Maria Marshall, an assistant professor of agricultural economics, found that nearly two-thirds of U.S. growers aren't interested in spending the time and money to become certified as sustainable. One-third hadn't even heard of certification organizations such as Veriflora and MPS, which can charge thousands of dollars for certifications.

“It can be expensive, and you have to go through rigorous screenings and paperwork. It takes a lot of time," Lopez said. "Most growers didn't think it was worth it."

Based on surveys of 112 commercial flower growers, Lopez said the ability to recoup the cost of being certified is the growers' chief concern. He said the floriculture industry's profits have not always kept up with costs in the last decade, and most growers are unwilling to pay thousands of dollars for something that hasn't been proven to bring a return on investment.

In the last decade, poinsettias, for example, have increased a little more than 13 per cent in price, but the cost of natural gas has more than doubled. Growers with thin profit margins are concerned about spending on a certification that isn't guaranteed to raise profits.

The teams' findings, reported in the early online version of the journal HortScience, are similar to an earlier Lopez study in which growers were wary of adopting sustainable practices and technologies because of concerns about whether those practices would increase profits.

"They feel that conversion to sustainable production practices is still risky," Lopez said. "They're unsure of some of the technology."

Converting to a sustainable technology or practice – water recycling systems, biological instead of chemical controls or alternative energy sources – can be costly. Using some of the technology incorrectly also could lead to losses, for example if recycled water spreads disease.

Lopez said the market for sustainable products is growing, however. He said about $230 billion is spent each year on socially and environmentally responsible products.

Lopez said growers were interested in seeing objective research data on how becoming certified as sustainable would increase profits. He said his future research would focus on that area. The Ball Horticultural Company and a Purdue Mission Oriented Grant funded the research.

 

 

ABSTRACT

Barriers to Adopting Sustainable Floriculture Certification

Tanya J. Hall, Roberto G. Lopez, Maria I. Marshall, Jennifer H. Dennis

In recent years, the commercial greenhouse industry has begun to implement sustainable production practices. However, foriculture certification programs for sustainable production practices are a relatively new phenomenon in the United States. Between July and Oct. 2008, a commercial foriculture grower survey was conducted to determine potential barriers to sustainable foriculture certification. Using a logistic regression model, seven potential areas were evaluated: risk, profitability, economic viability, prior experience, education, operation size, and customer types. Although respondents had positive attitudes toward sustainability and had adopted sustainable practices, respondents had little knowledge and interest in U.S. certification.

 


 

 
Submit News Release